Efficacy and safety of oral ritlecitinib for the treatment of active nonsegmental vitiligo: A randomized phase 2b clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Vitiligo is a chronic autoimmune disorder characterized by depigmented patches of the skin. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of ritlecitinib, an oral JAK3 (Janus kinase)/TEC (tyrosine kinase expressed in hepatocelluar carcinoma) inhibitor, in patients with active nonsegmental vitiligo in a phase 2b trial (NCT03715829). METHODS: Patients were randomized to once-daily oral ritlecitinib ± 4-week loading dose (200/50 mg, 100/50 mg, 30 mg, or 10 mg) or placebo for 24 weeks (dose-ranging period). Patients subsequently received ritlecitinib 200/50 mg daily in a 24-week extension period. The primary efficacy endpoint was percent change from baseline in Facial-Vitiligo Area Scoring Index at week 24. RESULTS: A total of 364 patients were treated in the dose-ranging period. Significant differences from placebo in percent change from baseline in Facial-Vitiligo Area Scoring Index were observed for the ritlecitinib 50 mg groups with (-21.2 vs 2.1; P < .001) or without (-18.5 vs 2.1; P < .001) a loading dose and ritlecitinib 30 mg group (-14.6 vs 2.1; P = .01). Accelerated improvement was observed after treatment with ritlecitinib 200/50 mg in the extension period (n = 187). No dose-dependent trends in treatment-emergent or serious adverse events were observed across the 48-week treatment. LIMITATIONS: Patients with stable vitiligo only were excluded. CONCLUSIONS: Oral ritlecitinib was effective and well tolerated over 48 weeks in patients with active nonsegmental vitiligo.

Safety and Efficacy of Ritlecitinib and Brepocitinib in Alopecia Areata: Results from the Crossover Open-Label Extension of the ALLEGRO Phase 2a Trial.

The 24-week, double-blind period of the ALLEGRO phase 2a trial (NCT02974868) evaluated the safety and efficacy of ritlecitinib (Jak3/tyrosine kinase expressed in the hepatocellular carcinoma inhibitor) and brepocitinib (tyrosine kinase 2/Jak1 inhibitor) in patients with alopecia areata; patients could subsequently continue treatment in a 24-week single-blind extension, followed by a crossover open-label extension, described in this article. Patients who did not achieve ≥30% improvement from baseline in Severity of Alopecia Tool score at the end of the single-blind extension entered a 24-week crossover open-label extension: the ritlecitinib group switched to brepocitinib, and the brepocitinib group switched to ritlecitinib. Eighteen patients switched to brepocitinib, and five switched to ritlecitinib. Six treatment-emergent adverse events were reported by five patients; no new safety risks were observed after crossover. An exploratory efficacy evaluation showed that none of the five patients receiving ritlecitinib in the crossover open-label extension achieved ≥30% improvement from baseline in Severity of Alopecia Tool score or improvement in eyebrow/eyelash assessments. Four of 16 patients receiving brepocitinib achieved ≥30% improvement from baseline in Severity of Alopecia Tool score or better; 4 of 15 and 5 of 12 showed improvement in eyebrow and eyelash assessments, respectively. Although the small number of patients precludes firm conclusions regarding efficacy, the data suggest that some patients with alopecia areata and inadequate response to ritlecitinib after ≥24 weeks show benefit after switching to brepocitinib.

Ritlecitinib and brepocitinib demonstrate significant improvement in scalp alopecia areata biomarkers.

BACKGROUND: Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors have shown encouraging results in the treatment of alopecia areata (AA), an autoimmune form of hair loss, in small, uncontrolled studies and case reports. OBJECTIVE: We conducted a biopsy substudy during the randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled first 24 weeks of a phase 2a clinical trial that evaluated the efficacy and safety of ritlecitinib, an inhibitor of JAK3 and the tyrosine kinase expressed in hepatocellular carcinoma (TEC) kinase family, and brepocitinib, an inhibitor of tyrosine kinase 2 (TYK2)/JAK1 in the treatment of AA. METHODS: Change in biomarkers in lesional scalp biopsy samples between baseline and weeks 12 and 24 was an exploratory end point, and 46 patients participated from the ritlecitinib (n = 18), brepocitinib (n = 16), and placebo (n = 12) groups. Correlations of biomarkers with hair regrowth, measured using the Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT) score, were also evaluated. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02974868. RESULTS: At week 24, both ritlecitinib and brepocitinib demonstrated improvement exceeding 100% in the lesional scalp transcriptome toward a nonlesional profile. At week 12, the improvements in scalp tissue were greater with brepocitinib than ritlecitinib; however, at week 24, the improvements were greater with ritlecitinib. CONCLUSIONS: For both ritlecitinib and brepocitinib, improvement in the SALT scores was positively associated with expression of TH1 markers and negatively associated with expression of hair keratins. Larger, long-term clinical trials are warranted.

A phase 2a randomized, placebo-controlled study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the oral Janus kinase inhibitors ritlecitinib and brepocitinib in alopecia areata: 24-week results.

BACKGROUND: Alopecia areata (AA) is an autoimmune form of hair loss with limited treatments. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of the Janus kinase inhibitors ritlecitinib and brepocitinib in patients who have AA with ≥ 50% scalp hair loss. METHODS: Patients were randomized to once-daily ritlecitinib, brepocitinib, or placebo. The primary efficacy endpoint was a 24-week change from baseline in the Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT) score. The key secondary efficacy endpoint was the proportion of patients achieving 30% improvement in SALT score (SALT30). RESULTS: The ritlecitinib, brepocitinib, and placebo groups included 48, 47, and 47 patients, respectively. At week 24, least-squares mean difference from placebo in SALT score change from baseline was 31.1 (95% confidence interval [CI], 18.8-43.5) for ritlecitinib and 49.2 (95% CI, 36.6-61.7) for brepocitinib (P < .0001 for both comparisons with placebo). SALT30 was achieved by 50% (90% CI, 38%-62%) of patients receiving ritlecitinib, 64% (90% CI, 51%-75%) receiving brepocitinib, and 2% (90% CI, 0%-9%) receiving placebo. Two patients experienced a serious adverse event (rhabdomyolysis) in the brepocitinib group only. LIMITATIONS: Only a single-dosage regimen of each study drug was included. CONCLUSION: Treatment with ritlecitinib or brepocitinib for 24 weeks was efficacious and generally well tolerated.

Multiplex assessment of serum cytokine and chemokine levels in idiopathic morphea and vitamin K1-induced morphea.

The levels of 63 cytokines, chemokines, and growth factors were measured in the serum of four patients with idiopathic morphea and of one patient with vitamin K1-induced morphea employing a multiplex assay to identify the role of inflammatory/immunologic events in their pathogenesis. Full-thickness skin biopsies of affected skin were analyzed by histopathology. Luminex assays for 63 cytokines, chemokines, and growth factors were performed in the sera from four patients with idiopathic morphea and in two different samples of serum obtained in two separate occasions from one patient with vitamin K1-induced morphea. The serum values of numerous inflammatory cytokines and growth factors including IL-2, IL-4, IL-6, and IFNß were markedly increased in the serum of patients with idiopathic morphea, whereas, these values were normal in the serum of the patient with vitamin K1-induced morphea. In contrast, serum eotaxin levels were greater than threefold higher in the patient with vitamin K1-induced morphea compared to patients with idiopathic morphea. The results demonstrated remarkable increases in the levels of numerous cytokines and chemokines in the serum samples of all patients with idiopathic morphea indicative of a prominent role of inflammatory/immunologic events in its pathogenesis. The results also showed statistically significant differences between idiopathic morphea and vitamin K1-induced morphea suggesting that their development involves different pathogenetic mechanisms.